Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| treatment_plans [2026/08/15 17:52] – andrewtaustin | treatment_plans [2026/10/08 07:06] (current) – Add consent, suitability and outcome monitoring articles to related reading andrewtaustin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{tag> | ||
| ====== IEMT Treatment Plans ====== | ====== IEMT Treatment Plans ====== | ||
| - | ===== For Clients Facing Complex Mental Health, Emotional, | + | ===== Planning |
| - | For IEMT Practitioners working in contemporary and everyday situations, a treatment plan is unlikely | + | A useful |
| - | A treatment plan is a set of written instructions and records pertaining to the treatment and management of a mental health condition and/or crisis. A treatment plan should include the client’s key personal information, | + | This page translates the proposed [[governing_principles|Roy-informed governing principles]] into a practical workflow. It is an application developed for this wiki, not a validated assessment instrument, an established IEMT standard or a protocol authored by Callista Roy. It does not expand a practitioner' |
| - | There is no one treatment plan model that is preferred by all clinicians in the mental health system. Different teams may have different preferences based on their own training, experiences, and the needs of their clients. However, there are some treatment plan models that are commonly used in mental health settings, including: | + | **Start with what the person wants to become possible. Assess the response and its circumstances, agree an appropriate action, and review both the experience and the practical outcome.** |
| - | * **The bio-psycho-social model:** This model takes into account | + | Use the [[adaptive_formulation|Adaptive Formulation |
| - | * **The stages of change model:** This model is often used in substance abuse treatment and is based on the idea that people go through different | + | ===== Use the framework across three stages |
| - | * **The trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy model:** This model is used to treat individuals who have experienced trauma and is based on the idea that trauma can affect a person' | + | |
| + | - **Planning: | ||
| + | - **Review:** compare the agreed indicators, check the client' | ||
| - | Ultimately, the most effective treatment | + | The [[adaptive_formulation# |
| - | {{ :img6.png |}} | + | |
| - | A treatment plan should include: | + | ===== Contents of a Treatment Plan ===== |
| - | * A definition, qualification, | + | The plan is an agreement developed with the client. Include only information relevant to understanding |
| - | * A description of the treatment proposed by the coach/ | + | |
| - | * A timeline for treatment, including frequency | + | |
| - | * Identification of the major treatment goals in the SMART[(SMART_criteria> | + | |
| - | Whilst for many clients a treatment plan is not necessary, there are many scenarios | + | * **Purpose: |
| + | * **Starting point:** what the client | ||
| + | * **Formulation: | ||
| + | * **Action:** an IEMT target if appropriate, | ||
| + | * **Review:** indicators of progress, possible unwanted effects, the review date and the decision about further work. | ||
| + | * **Coordination: | ||
| - | Where the appropriate permissions exist, the treatment plans may be shared with mental health professionals and community support teams in order to increase multidisciplinary communication, | + | Record diagnoses already made by an appropriately qualified professional with their source where relevant. An IEMT formulation describes |
| - | IEMT Practitioners should consider a treatment | + | For brief work, these elements may fit on one page. Where several services are involved, clarify who is responsible for each action and how the plan connects with existing care. Age, disability, culture, language and communication preferences may affect how planning is conducted. Sexual orientation and gender identity are not themselves problems to be treated; attend to the person' |
| - | * Clients experiencing serious mental illness or distress | + | ===== From assessment to action ===== |
| - | * Clients experiencing multiple issues affecting them emotionally, | + | |
| - | * Clients with serious physical health issues | + | |
| - | * Clients engaged in the criminal justice system | + | |
| - | * Clients under compulsory treatment orders | + | |
| - | * Clients engaged with multiple care/ | + | |
| - | * Clients referred by employers | + | |
| - | * Working with teenagers and/or their families | + | |
| - | * The vulnerable elderly | + | |
| - | * Clients with developmental disabilities and/or intellectual challenges | + | |
| - | * Clients experiencing sexual orientation or gender identity issues | + | |
| - | * Clients who are being bullied and/or abused and/or exploited | + | |
| - | * Clients with little socio-economic resource, minimal opportunities, | + | |
| - | Each treatment plan is unique to each individual though many similarities and recurring themes will undoubtedly arise over time. | + | ==== 1. Agree the outcome and establish a baseline ==== |
| - | {{ :img7.png |}} | + | Ask what the client would like to do, experience or sustain differently. Translate a broad request such as "I want to stop feeling anxious" |
| - | ---- | + | For example: "I want to contribute an idea during our weekly team meeting, even if I still feel some nervousness." |
| + | Agree the reference situation, scale anchors if using a rating, and a review point. A range, a verbal description or "I cannot tell yet" may be more accurate than a precise number. Do not make a zero distress rating a universal requirement for success. | ||
| - | ===== Contents of a Treatment Plan ===== | + | **Make the outcome reviewable.** Agree these details before an intervention, |
| - | All treatment plans are specific to each client. They are the collaborative result of the discussions | + | ^ Record ^ Example agreed with Alex ^ |
| + | | Life outcome and why it matters | Contribute an idea in a team meeting, so Alex can participate in a valued work role. | | ||
| + | | Everyday indicator and baseline | Whether Alex contributes when a suitable opportunity occurs; no contribution at the last three meetings, with the available opportunities clarified. | | ||
| + | | Experience indicator | ||
| + | | What would be useful | One prepared contribution at each of the next two meetings where a suitable opportunity is available; discuss whether this felt worthwhile to Alex. | | ||
| + | | Review point and conditions | Review after those meetings, or sooner if the plan becomes unsuitable. Record cancelled meetings and changes in format or support. | | ||
| - | Differences | + | These numbers illustrate an individual agreement, not a clinical cut-off or a required IEMT outcome. Compare like with like: a rating about an imagined meeting |
| - | * Demographics and personal history | + | ==== 2. Describe |
| - | * Assessment/ | + | |
| - | * The presenting problem – i.e. the problems or symptoms that initially brought the client to treatment | + | |
| - | * Existing resources – the pre-existing resources that the client brings to treatment. These will be either intrinsic (i.e. the client' | + | |
| - | * Treatment contract – the agreement between the therapist and client that summarises the intentions of treatment | + | |
| - | * Responsibilities – a section on who is responsible for which components of treatment, including the coach/ | + | |
| - | * Treatment outcomes – what are the intended and expected outcomes of treatment | + | |
| - | * Specific interventions – the techniques, exercises, and interventions deployed by the coach/ | + | |
| - | * Session frequency, duration, and number | + | |
| - | * Progress/ | + | |
| - | {{ :img8.png |}} | + | |
| - | ---- | + | Explore what occurs, when it occurs, what follows, when it is absent and what already helps. Distinguish the client' |
| + | "The client reports a racing heart before speaking" | ||
| - | ===== Behavioural Observations ===== | + | Useful prompts are: "What happened just before this?", |
| - | **Note behavioural observations of the client' | + | Consider whether a response provides useful protection as well as creating difficulty. Do not assume every response has a discoverable protective purpose. The plan should |
| - | The coach/ | + | ==== 3. Map the current demands |
| - | Examples of observations that constitute | + | Roy distinguishes three stimulus categories: **focal**, |
| - | * Orientation to time, date, and place | + | Use the categories as a working description, revisable as understanding changes. A remembered event or an imagined future conversation can be the focal stimulus now. " |
| - | * Self-grooming and hygiene (also observe fingernails, | + | |
| - | * Eye contact - avoidant, little, none, or normal | + | |
| - | * Mood - angry, withdrawn, irritable, tearful, anxious, depressed, etc | + | |
| - | * Affect - appropriate/ | + | |
| - | * Thought content disturbances - i.e. delusions, hallucinations, | + | |
| - | * Behavioural disturbances such as aggression, poor impulse control, unreasonable demands | + | |
| - | * Motor activity - agitation, calm, restless, rigid | + | |
| - | * Speech (volume, speed, coherence) | + | |
| - | * Interactional style (i) - i.e. nervous giggling, bombastic, cooperative, | + | |
| - | * Interactional style (ii) - active participant, | + | |
| - | * Intellectual functioning (impaired, unimpaired) | + | |
| - | * Memory - short-term, long-term | + | |
| - | * Perceptual disturbances - i.e. hallucinations, | + | |
| - | * Attention span - ability to focus and concentrate | + | |
| - | {{ :img9.png |}} | + | Ask about practical constraints and resources: workload, rest, access to help, illness, finances, housing, relationships, |
| - | **Recommended Reading** | + | ==== 4. Review the four adaptive modes ==== |
| - | " | + | For individuals, |
| - | authors | + | |
| - | title : The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life | + | |
| - | published : 1959 | + | |
| - | publisher : Anchor Books | + | |
| - | isbn : 978-0-14-013571-8 | + | |
| - | url : | + | |
| - | )][(The_Presentation_of_Self_in_Everyday_Life> | + | |
| - | " | + | ^ Mode ^ Explore with the client ^ What could be reviewed? ^ |
| - | authors | + | | Physiological | Rest, bodily comfort, daily activity |
| - | title : Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients | + | | Self-concept | Meanings about oneself, personal values and any conflict between them. | Whether a difficult experience still becomes a global judgement of personal worth. | |
| - | published : 1961 | + | | Role function | Responsibilities, |
| - | publisher : Doubleday | + | | Interdependence | Giving, receiving and declining support; relationships and boundaries. | A request for help, the response received and whether the support is usable. | |
| - | isbn : 978-0-14-013739-2 | + | |
| - | url : https://en.wikipedia.org/ | + | |
| - | )][(Asylums_(book)> | + | |
| - | ---- | + | Record strengths as well as difficulties. Every mode need not become a treatment target. Bodily symptoms requiring assessment belong with an appropriately qualified professional, |
| + | **Choose a priority together.** For each relevant mode, note a strength, a difficulty and whether action is wanted now. Ask which issue most limits the chosen outcome and which need must be addressed first. Do not add the four modes into a total score or infer a Roy adaptation level from a distress rating. | ||
| - | ===== Specific Assessment Tools ===== | + | ==== 5. Write a working formulation and choose an action |
| - | Assessment tools are standardised systems and processes that facilitate | + | Summarise |
| - | ==== Examples of Commonly Used Assessment Tools ==== | + | > When anticipating speaking in a meeting, the client recalls a humiliating presentation and expects renewed criticism. This may contribute to avoidance. Limited preparation time and the meeting format also matter. We have not established that the remembered event caused the difficulty. |
| - | 1. Anxiety[(Anxiety> | + | Then explain why the proposed action fits. An IEMT target might be a particular reported emotional response or identity statement, where work on that target is within the practitioner' |
| - | * Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7)[(Generalized_Anxiety_Disorder_7> | + | |
| - | * Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS)[(DASS> | + | |
| - | * Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale[(Hamilton_Anxiety_Rating_Scale> | + | |
| + | Discuss the intended benefit, uncertainty, | ||
| - | 2. Depression[(MDD> | + | Where needs exceed the practitioner' |
| - | * Geriatric Depression Scale[(Geriatric_Depression_Scale> | + | |
| - | * The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale[(Rating_Depression_Scale> | + | |
| + | **Turn the formulation into an action plan.** Each action needs an owner, an agreed time or trigger, and a way to check what happened. Keep actions within the person' | ||
| - | 3. Addiction[(Screening | + | ^ Action ^ Responsibility and timing ^ What to review ^ |
| - | * Addiction Severity Index (ASI)[(Addiction_severity_index> | + | | Consider the agreed IEMT target, if suitable and chosen. | Practitioner |
| - | * Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C)[(Alcohol_Use_Disorders_Identification_Test> | + | | Prepare a short contribution and consider requesting speaking time. | In Alex's fictional plan, Alex chooses whether and when to prepare and approach the chair before the next meeting. | Whether preparation and the request occurred; whether a usable opportunity was provided. | |
| - | * South Oaks Gambling Screen Assessment (SOGS)[(SOGS> | + | | Arrange other assessment, support or coordination where indicated. | Name the agreed person or service and the next contact or review date. Obtain permission for any sharing of information. | Whether contact and access occurred, and what remains unavailable or outside the practitioner' |
| - | * Brief Addiction Monitor | + | |
| - | * Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)[(DAST> | + | |
| + | An intended referral is not the same as care received. Record the agreed next step if access is delayed. This planning framework does not provide a reason to delay care the person needs. The client can revisit a decision before the scheduled review; shared decision making is ongoing. [[https:// | ||
| - | 4. Trauma | + | ==== 6. Record what was done and review what followed ==== |
| - | * Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5)[(PCL-5> | + | |
| - | * The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale[(K10> | + | |
| + | Record the agreed target, what was actually undertaken, any modification or stopping of the work, and the client' | ||
| - | 5. Behavioural | + | Use the same reference situation and measurement method where possible. Ask about unchanged difficulties, |
| - | * Wahler Self-Description Inventory[(Wahler> | + | |
| - | * Daily Living Activities (ADL)[(ADL> | + | |
| - | * Parental Stress Scale (PSS)[(PSS> | + | |
| - | 6. Pain[(PS> | + | ==== 7. Decide the next step together ==== |
| - | * Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)[(NRS> | + | ^ Finding at review ^ Implication for the next decision ^ |
| - | * Visual Analog Scale (VAS)[(VAS> | + | | The agreed life outcome improves and the client finds the change useful. | Consider concluding or reducing the work. Continue only for an agreed purpose, rather than assuming more sessions are required. | |
| - | * Defense | + | | Participation improves while some distress remains. | Check whether the outcome is valuable |
| - | * Adult Non-Verbal Pain Scale (NVPS)[(NVPS> | + | | The target feeling changes but the intended activity remains difficult. | Review skills, opportunities, |
| - | * Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia Scale (PAINAD)[(PAINAD> | + | | There is no useful change. | Reconsider the target, intervention, |
| - | * Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS)[(BPS> | + | | There are unwanted effects, deterioration or loss of consent. | Pause or stop the relevant procedure and assess what response or additional care is needed. Record the concern, action and responsibility for follow-up. | |
| - | * Critical-Care Observation Tool (CPOT)[(CPOT> | + | | The relevant situation has not occurred, or follow-up is missing. | Record what is unknown. Agree a proportionate review if wanted; do not count missing information as success or failure. | |
| + | | A difficulty returns after improvement. | Establish what returned, in which setting and what changed. Preserve evidence of gains that remain while reassessing the current need. | | ||
| + | | Circumstances or the client' | ||
| - | {{: | + | Reporting no improvement, |
| - | ---- | + | **Finish each review with a decision and a reason.** Record continue, revise, conclude, pause or refer; who will do what; and when the decision will next be revisited, if appropriate. The client may choose no further work. At completion, record the gain, remaining limits and how the client can seek appropriate further help if circumstances change. Follow-up timing should fit the agreed question, rather than a universal schedule. See [[maintenance_generalisation_return_symptoms|Maintenance, |
| + | |||
| + | ===== Behavioural Observations ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Document relevant observations in descriptive language. "The client asked to pause and looked away" preserves what happened. Calling the same behaviour " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Check the meaning with the client and consider communication style, culture, disability, fatigue and the interaction itself. Eye contact, emotional expression or uncertain language alone does not establish motivation, mental capacity or a diagnosis. A formal mental status examination or diagnostic assessment requires the relevant competence; IEMT training alone should not be treated as conferring it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Specific Assessment Tools ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Choose a measure because it answers a relevant question and suits the person' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Where using a standardised instrument, follow its current instructions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | For example, the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) can support symptom monitoring and screening, but its publisher specifies clinician interpretation and distinguishes it from a structured diagnostic interview. It is not a universal IEMT outcome measure. [[https:// | ||
| ===== Targets, Goals and Outcomes ===== | ===== Targets, Goals and Outcomes ===== | ||
| - | To evaluate | + | Keep three records distinct: |
| + | |||
| + | * **Target: | ||
| + | * **Life outcome:** what the client wants to become possible beyond the session. | ||
| + | * **Evidence at review:** what the client reports, what was observed and what remains unknown. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A lower distress rating with continued inability to perform a valued activity is a partial result. Participation despite some continuing distress may be meaningful progress. The interpretation depends on the client' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== SMART Goals ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | SMART can be used as a writing aid: make a goal specific, measurable, achievable, relevant | ||
| + | |||
| + | For example: "Over the next two team meetings, I would like to contribute one prepared idea at each. At our review we will discuss what happened, how it felt and whether the meeting conditions supported this." | ||
| + | |||
| + | Include dependencies: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Worked examples ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Both examples are fictional planning illustrations. Their review scenarios are hypothetical, | ||
| + | |||
| + | For completed assessment, action and review entries, see [[worked_examples|Worked Examples: Assessment, Planning and Review]]. That page develops Alex and Morgan into fictional records and adds Sam, whose follow-up outcome remains unknown. Every recorded outcome is invented for teaching. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Example 1: a possible IEMT target within a wider plan ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Situation and outcome.** Alex avoids contributing at otherwise supportive team meetings and wants to offer one prepared idea at each of the next two meetings. Alex recalls an embarrassing presentation | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Formulation.** The immediate focal stimulus is the anticipated meeting. Limited preparation time and a rapidly moving discussion are contextual factors. The recalled embarrassment is relevant material to explore, but its causal role has not been established. If its current influence remains unclear, record that uncertainty. Do not classify it as residual merely because it happened | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Four-mode review.** Alex reports restless sleep before meetings, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Agreed action.** If assessment supports its suitability and Alex chooses it, the practitioner proposes IEMT work on the agreed emotional response within their training. Alex also prepares a short contribution and considers asking the chair for an opportunity to speak. The practitioner explains uncertainty about benefit and agrees a stopping signal and review after the two meetings. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Review scenarios.** Reduced distress together with useful participation would support discussing whether the agreed work is complete. Reduced distress without participation would prompt review of preparation, | ||
| - | People in treatment are more likely to complete objectives when the goals are personally important to them; therefore, all goals should add value or meaning to the client's situation. | + | **What an incomplete review would mean.** Suppose |
| - | <WRAP center round tip 90%> | + | ==== Example 2: practical support takes priority ==== |
| - | “//People are not lazy. They simply have impotent goals—that is, goals that do not inspire them.//” — **Tony Robbins** | + | |
| - | “//If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things.// | + | **Situation and outcome.** Morgan is caring for a relative while working changing shifts. Morgan asks to remove the guilt associated with saying no, but also reports persistent exhaustion and insufficient help. The chosen outcome is a sustainable arrangement for care and rest. |
| - | </ | + | |
| + | **Formulation.** An immediate request to cover another night of care is the focal stimulus. Existing workload, interrupted rest and limited available help are contextual factors. A family expectation about always being available is a possible influence to explore, not an assumed cause. | ||
| - | ===== SMART Goals ===== | + | **Four-mode review.** The discussion identifies lack of rest, a belief that asking for assistance means failure, competing work and caring roles, and a support network with real limits. Morgan already has a clear understanding of the care required. |
| - | The SMART Goals[(#1)] model is an effective tool used in professional settings | + | **Agreed action.** |
| - | {{ :img10.png |}} | + | **Review scenarios.** Review whether help was accessible, whether the workload became manageable and how Morgan experienced the changes. If support is unavailable, |
| - | By using this innovative methodology to structure goal-setting practices, organisations will have a greater chance of successful goal attainment. | + | ===== Using and evaluating the framework ===== |
| - | All outcomes, aims and treatment goals should be measurable using the SMART criteria: | + | Use the [[adaptive_formulation|formulation |
| - | * **Specific** – target a specific area for improvement. (// | + | The framework' |
| - | * **Measurable** – quantify or at least suggest an indicator | + | |
| - | * **Assignable** – specify who will do it. (//who//) | + | |
| - | * **Realistic** – state what results can realistically be achieved, given available resources. (//why//) | + | |
| - | * **Time-related** – specify when the result(s) can be achieved. (//when//) | + | |
| + | ===== See also ===== | ||
| - | The terms S.M.A.R.T. Goals and S.M.A.R.T. Objectives are often used. Although the acronym SMART generally stays the same, // | + | * [[governing_principles|Roy' |
| + | * [[adaptive_formulation|Adaptive Formulation | ||
| + | * [[worked_examples|Worked Examples: Assessment, Planning | ||
| + | * [[adapt|Integral Eye Movement Therapy | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| - | Two additional criteria create the SMARTER system: | + | * [[informed_consent_shared_decision_making|Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making]] |
| + | * [[assessment_suitability_referral|Assessment, | ||
| + | * [[adverse_effects_deterioration_non_response|Adverse Effects, Deterioration and Non-Response]] | ||
| - | * **Evaluate** - The sixth step in goal setting using the S.M.A.R.T.E.R. method is to ensure that all progress towards each goal is evaluated. | + | {{tag> |
| - | * **Readjust** - The seventh step is to adjust treatment according to the evaluation. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||